Someone is making people believe Jesus made a mistake by not writing His own accounts Himself and the four gospels which gave the account of Jesus were contradictory.
Even went far by asking if Jesus Christ could read or write? Get some answers if you care! First and foremost, if you do not even believe in His divinity as God, how then can you believe that He could read or write? John1:1-3 states that "In the beginning was the word, the word was with God and the Word was God.
He was in the beginning with God.
All things were made through Him and without Him nothing was made that was made.
He was the word made flesh and hence has no need to write.
His life is the word which was told to us by his witnesses.
Now on a more simpler and secular terms, Jesus Christ had a specific Job to do and that is to do His father's business (Luke2:49) which is to come and redeem Mankind and not to begin some Autobiography.
The writing and the preaching has been left to those who witnessed Him and subsequently to those who believe (Matthew28:19-20).
And the first people to do this were of course His closest followers, His disciples.
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, making the Gospel of the Bible.
If you discover any controversy between these gospels, bring it out.
But also, why must you believe these books should be exactly the same? There would be no need having them all in the Bible, but rather one would be selected to represent the others.
Consider this scenario, If there was a car accident, and Mr.
A saw it in the perspective that the driver hit his head on the glass while the woman in front with him (the driver) flew out of the car, whereas Mr.
B who had a rear view, testified that there was a boy who hit the roof of the car as the driver hit the glass but said nothing about the woman, because He did not see her; does that mean both stories are wrong, even if they are actually true? No! But when you combine these two stories together, you get a broader view of what really happened during the accident.
2nd Timothy3:16b says "All scriptures is inspired by God" Doesn't mean God single-handedly 'hand-write' the Bible.
He inspired Men to do so and you will not expect Him to twist their personal experiences just to make the Bible the same.
If it was a revelation or a prophesy, then it is a different ball game all together, because God is using His chosen ones to say or write what is yet to happen.
But so far as the disciples of Jesus are writing on account of their experiences with Him (Jesus), God Inspired them within the limits of what they actually experienced, know and saw.
It is now left for us to combine these inspired driven experiences to get a broader view and greater inspiration from the word of God.
Whether Jesus Christ was able to read or not, the most important thing is that He saved us and irrespective of whether we can read or write too, He will save us if we accept Him.
After all, regardless of this, the Bible was still written and the Gospel is well accessible to all Man kind.
This is another proof that He was indeed the word made flesh.
Even went far by asking if Jesus Christ could read or write? Get some answers if you care! First and foremost, if you do not even believe in His divinity as God, how then can you believe that He could read or write? John1:1-3 states that "In the beginning was the word, the word was with God and the Word was God.
He was in the beginning with God.
All things were made through Him and without Him nothing was made that was made.
He was the word made flesh and hence has no need to write.
His life is the word which was told to us by his witnesses.
Now on a more simpler and secular terms, Jesus Christ had a specific Job to do and that is to do His father's business (Luke2:49) which is to come and redeem Mankind and not to begin some Autobiography.
The writing and the preaching has been left to those who witnessed Him and subsequently to those who believe (Matthew28:19-20).
And the first people to do this were of course His closest followers, His disciples.
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, making the Gospel of the Bible.
If you discover any controversy between these gospels, bring it out.
But also, why must you believe these books should be exactly the same? There would be no need having them all in the Bible, but rather one would be selected to represent the others.
Consider this scenario, If there was a car accident, and Mr.
A saw it in the perspective that the driver hit his head on the glass while the woman in front with him (the driver) flew out of the car, whereas Mr.
B who had a rear view, testified that there was a boy who hit the roof of the car as the driver hit the glass but said nothing about the woman, because He did not see her; does that mean both stories are wrong, even if they are actually true? No! But when you combine these two stories together, you get a broader view of what really happened during the accident.
2nd Timothy3:16b says "All scriptures is inspired by God" Doesn't mean God single-handedly 'hand-write' the Bible.
He inspired Men to do so and you will not expect Him to twist their personal experiences just to make the Bible the same.
If it was a revelation or a prophesy, then it is a different ball game all together, because God is using His chosen ones to say or write what is yet to happen.
But so far as the disciples of Jesus are writing on account of their experiences with Him (Jesus), God Inspired them within the limits of what they actually experienced, know and saw.
It is now left for us to combine these inspired driven experiences to get a broader view and greater inspiration from the word of God.
Whether Jesus Christ was able to read or not, the most important thing is that He saved us and irrespective of whether we can read or write too, He will save us if we accept Him.
After all, regardless of this, the Bible was still written and the Gospel is well accessible to all Man kind.
This is another proof that He was indeed the word made flesh.
SHARE
