Everybody to the survival of the fittest, will try to adapt to the survival of metrics. If the economic system is changed, the criteria for determining the fittest will change everyone's behavior as changed. What kind of person who can adapt to the new guidelines, its economic effects are changes, this is the eternal truth. In most people's ethical or moral values, you may think that certain criteria or law is unreasonable. The law of the jungle such as Vietnam, Cambodia and Uganda, Idi Amin era, many people think ethically justified, but is also economically wasteful behavior. However, some apparently Christian Louboutin Shoes is ideal and affordable metrics, but it is very wasteful. For example, we might think that the "first come, first served" is very reasonable, but as noted above, Queuing and scrambling was wasted. Some people think that there should be respect for the elderly; but if the age on the success or failure, many young people would not have to develop their strengths, just impatiently waiting for the elderly, or a waste of resources to play old age, false.
In the life of the measure under communism competition victory or defeat, as we know it's really a lot; I do not know, probably more than that. "Law, 000 rule" is easy to believe, we do know of one revolution of the so-called "correct" political ideas for metrics, the extent of its waste, history has no precedent. National day in politics, read the Red Book, intellectuals who, ten years continuously. These models can be built millions of factory and housing. This was a failure in one of the reasons is based on different criteria to measure the outcome of the competition in the life of the people according to the principle of survival of the fittest. We do not think that in some ideal economic system, is equal to survive. In fact, still the fittest bushizhe eliminated. To the cultural revolution, for example, politician and will run through the back door man is the "fittest"; good at production, many have been eliminated. For any one system, the "fittest" and "bushizhe" remains. Because people have different terms and conditions, in the same measurement standards would be the outcome. The development of China's modernization, now we cannot speculate. But that is not carrying out private property rights regime, there would be no market Wedding Shoes value may be used as a benchmark. No matter what the Communist, the reform of community waste guidelines will continue to appear. Although wasting extent unlawfully speculated that does not like during the cultural revolution.
There is one to conclude that the survival of the fittest, many people thought it was not reasonable, but the guidelines resulting from waste is minimal – this is the market value, as measured by the guidelines. If a certain style of garment production, selling and get rich, get rich because society that his product is valuable. This value is determined by the consumers; it is suitable for a living. If person production, although Louboutin Sale he thought the garment's contribution to society is large, but consumers who thinks he's contribution is insufficient, his clothing and therefore unmarketable, finally at a loss, the company closed down; b is to be eliminated.
If the market price used for guidelines, imagine someone to get a watch, he cannot use violence, it will not be able to, through, or rely on a high build, larger age, face, or engage in political thought, wrist or communication; he wants to be the only solution is to watch out for money. To select the adequate money, apparently irrational, and the stench is too heavy. But winning watches his money and where it came from money must be earned, to make money he must contribute to society, and his contribution at least equivalent to the value of the watch. Therefore to measure the success or failure, market prices for disposal guidelines, there is no waste. Any other criteria that have to watch the winner goes to waste. In thousands of metrics, only Christian Louboutin Sale to be decided on the basis of market prices was wasted. We do not think that in capitalist society, the market price as criteria too philistine vulgarity putting too, regardless of its usefulness. We don't because in some so-called capitalist society, some people abuse the power of money, and think that money is bad. In these societies, some rich people considered against the money potential Ling; others operate with high reputation. These phenomena and, in some opinionated capitalist society. But this phenomenon occurs is based on the private property is not a sound system that is not the essence of capitalism, not in the market as a competitive factor.
I repeat, the only economic competition criteria are wasted. This standard only in the private property can only be effectively used. Private property rights system is the backbone of capitalism. If the abolition of private property rights, or in the definition of private property, other various forms of competitive metrics will come. The survival of the fittest, the principle of eliminating bushizhe has not changed, but changed the benchmark, it will cause all kinds of waste. Chinese economic scholar sunyefang during the cultural revolution, in which said "a thousand, million, the first value" in a Word, while proscribed in prison for seven years. After he was rehabilitated Christian Louboutin Boots in October 1978 in Guangming daily use this sentence to the value of importance. But confined to Marx's old hat, Sun on the value of the concept of access to modern economics. If Sun could understand market value can only be produced in the private property, and the value of other modern economics issues analysis already far exceeds that of Marx's era, his argument when there are different.
In the life of the measure under communism competition victory or defeat, as we know it's really a lot; I do not know, probably more than that. "Law, 000 rule" is easy to believe, we do know of one revolution of the so-called "correct" political ideas for metrics, the extent of its waste, history has no precedent. National day in politics, read the Red Book, intellectuals who, ten years continuously. These models can be built millions of factory and housing. This was a failure in one of the reasons is based on different criteria to measure the outcome of the competition in the life of the people according to the principle of survival of the fittest. We do not think that in some ideal economic system, is equal to survive. In fact, still the fittest bushizhe eliminated. To the cultural revolution, for example, politician and will run through the back door man is the "fittest"; good at production, many have been eliminated. For any one system, the "fittest" and "bushizhe" remains. Because people have different terms and conditions, in the same measurement standards would be the outcome. The development of China's modernization, now we cannot speculate. But that is not carrying out private property rights regime, there would be no market Wedding Shoes value may be used as a benchmark. No matter what the Communist, the reform of community waste guidelines will continue to appear. Although wasting extent unlawfully speculated that does not like during the cultural revolution.
There is one to conclude that the survival of the fittest, many people thought it was not reasonable, but the guidelines resulting from waste is minimal – this is the market value, as measured by the guidelines. If a certain style of garment production, selling and get rich, get rich because society that his product is valuable. This value is determined by the consumers; it is suitable for a living. If person production, although Louboutin Sale he thought the garment's contribution to society is large, but consumers who thinks he's contribution is insufficient, his clothing and therefore unmarketable, finally at a loss, the company closed down; b is to be eliminated.
If the market price used for guidelines, imagine someone to get a watch, he cannot use violence, it will not be able to, through, or rely on a high build, larger age, face, or engage in political thought, wrist or communication; he wants to be the only solution is to watch out for money. To select the adequate money, apparently irrational, and the stench is too heavy. But winning watches his money and where it came from money must be earned, to make money he must contribute to society, and his contribution at least equivalent to the value of the watch. Therefore to measure the success or failure, market prices for disposal guidelines, there is no waste. Any other criteria that have to watch the winner goes to waste. In thousands of metrics, only Christian Louboutin Sale to be decided on the basis of market prices was wasted. We do not think that in capitalist society, the market price as criteria too philistine vulgarity putting too, regardless of its usefulness. We don't because in some so-called capitalist society, some people abuse the power of money, and think that money is bad. In these societies, some rich people considered against the money potential Ling; others operate with high reputation. These phenomena and, in some opinionated capitalist society. But this phenomenon occurs is based on the private property is not a sound system that is not the essence of capitalism, not in the market as a competitive factor.
I repeat, the only economic competition criteria are wasted. This standard only in the private property can only be effectively used. Private property rights system is the backbone of capitalism. If the abolition of private property rights, or in the definition of private property, other various forms of competitive metrics will come. The survival of the fittest, the principle of eliminating bushizhe has not changed, but changed the benchmark, it will cause all kinds of waste. Chinese economic scholar sunyefang during the cultural revolution, in which said "a thousand, million, the first value" in a Word, while proscribed in prison for seven years. After he was rehabilitated Christian Louboutin Boots in October 1978 in Guangming daily use this sentence to the value of importance. But confined to Marx's old hat, Sun on the value of the concept of access to modern economics. If Sun could understand market value can only be produced in the private property, and the value of other modern economics issues analysis already far exceeds that of Marx's era, his argument when there are different.
SHARE
