One of the most basic tenets of portfolio risk management is, do not lose money.
Understanding the risk, you are assuming and how you intend to mitigate this risk is what separates successful investors from those that never make any money.
There are several types of portfolio investing risk.
Knowing the risk is the first step to making better investing decisions.
Macro Risk Categories In a macro sense, there are two types of risk.
Systematic risk, also known as market risk is the risk associated with the overall market.
An example is the overall trend of the stock market dictates a substantial part of the total return.
In this case, owning stocks from different sectors does not diversify away the systematic risk of the market.
You can mitigate systematic risks by hedging your positions with non-correlated assets (much harder to do than most think) or employ good stop management techniques to preserve your capital.
While stops are not part of the Modern Portfolio Theory, they have their use and should be part of your overall strategy.
Changes in interest rates, recessions, and major catastrophes are examples of systematic risk as they affect the entire market.
Unsystematic risk, also known as specific risk or diversifiable risk is the risk inherent in each investment.
Investors can offset specific risk with proper diversification.
For example, if you place all your money in a biotechnology company that has just received news that the FDA will not approve a new drug, you have encountered unsystematic or specific risk.
This news would cause the share price to fall precipitously.
Had you owned shares of several biotechnology companies or better yet companies in other industries, you would have reduced your risk.
On Jim Cramer's "Mad Money" program, he has a segment titled "Are you diversified?" People call in and give him five stocks they own in various industries.
He opines whether there is sufficient diversification in the portfolio.
All he is doing is suggesting how to hedge unsystematic risk.
Systematic or market risk will remain in the portfolios.
Index Funds The popular S&P 500 index funds are subject to market risk while diversifying away much of the specific risk of owning a specific stock or sector.
$10,000 invested into an S&P 500 index fund on January 4, 2000 would be worth $9,373.
09 as of November 30, 2009.
This is the affect systematic or market risk had on this investor's portfolio.
The diversification of holding the broad S&P 500 did not keep you from losing money.
Rather you felt the sting of owning the market, while employing appropriate hedge techniques would reduce or all but eliminate the affect of the losses in owning the market.
Core assets When examining a complete portfolio it is imperative to consider fully the important factors that comprise your core investable core assets.
Dr.
David Swensen, the Nobel Price winner in economics, has identified three characteristics of core assets that should be part of your evaluation to help reduce systematic or market risk.
oUse assets to hedge the market risk of other assets.
For example, real estate is a good hedge against the ravages of inflation, while bonds offer protection from a financial crisis.
By recognizing these inherent characteristics of your core assets, you can hedge some of the market risk inherent in an investing portfolio.
oThere should be fundamentally based market returns from the asset class.
If you are depending only on active management of the asset class, you are increasing the risk of losses by not being investing in the market.
oRely on liquid markets where there is a ready market to buy and sell your core asset.
Assets that cannot be immediately priced and sold, are subject to sudden and deep losses.
Liquid markets give you the opportunity to employ stop loss techniques should the market turn against you as in a recession.
Your stock portfolio is part of your total asset valuation that includes savings for emergencies, real estate, bonds, and possibly precious metals.
By taking this broad perspective, you have a better chance to employ overall hedges that are non-correlated to address market risk.
Asset Correlation In Modern Portfolio Theory, the most efficient method is to create an optimal mix of asset classes that generate the highest return to risk ratio.
By owning assets that do not correlation with each other, you can reduce the risk in your portfolio.
In a general sense, stocks and bonds tend to have a negative correlation.
When stocks perform well, bonds do not and when bonds perform well, stocks do not.
Market sectors have various levels of correlation.
Owning sectors that are not correlated highly help to reduce your risk.
For example, stocks are closely correlated to their sector.
In this case is better for the investor to own the sector rather than the individual.
Owning the sector helps to achieve some diversification, reducing specific risk of stock ownership.
By owning asset classes that are not highly correlated, you can reduce your risk.
The primary asset classes to consider are: oCommon assets of bonds, equities, real estate and cash oGeographies including the United States, European Union, the United Kingdom, Japan, China, India, Brazil and Latin America, rest of Asia, the Middle East.
oBond types such as Treasuries, corporate, short-term or long-term oMajor currencies including the US Dollar, the British Pound, the Euro, the Japanese Yen oIndustry sectors.
When you blend asset classes that have a low correlation to each other, you are lowering the risk in your portfolio.
Many investors fail to incorporate this thinking when they build their portfolios.
Using the R-Squared factor, a correlation of 1 indicates the asset classes are perfectly correlated.
A correlation coefficient of zero indicates there is no correlation in the performance of the asset classes.
For example, the S&P 500 and the Russell 2000 have a near perfect correlation of 0.
97.
Where as the average correlation among S&P sectors is 0.
32.
Asset allocation is the most essential factor in building a high performing portfolio.
Paying attention to the risk of each asset class allows you to create a portfolio that can beat the market in good times as well as bad.
Understanding the risk, you are assuming and how you intend to mitigate this risk is what separates successful investors from those that never make any money.
There are several types of portfolio investing risk.
Knowing the risk is the first step to making better investing decisions.
Macro Risk Categories In a macro sense, there are two types of risk.
Systematic risk, also known as market risk is the risk associated with the overall market.
An example is the overall trend of the stock market dictates a substantial part of the total return.
In this case, owning stocks from different sectors does not diversify away the systematic risk of the market.
You can mitigate systematic risks by hedging your positions with non-correlated assets (much harder to do than most think) or employ good stop management techniques to preserve your capital.
While stops are not part of the Modern Portfolio Theory, they have their use and should be part of your overall strategy.
Changes in interest rates, recessions, and major catastrophes are examples of systematic risk as they affect the entire market.
Unsystematic risk, also known as specific risk or diversifiable risk is the risk inherent in each investment.
Investors can offset specific risk with proper diversification.
For example, if you place all your money in a biotechnology company that has just received news that the FDA will not approve a new drug, you have encountered unsystematic or specific risk.
This news would cause the share price to fall precipitously.
Had you owned shares of several biotechnology companies or better yet companies in other industries, you would have reduced your risk.
On Jim Cramer's "Mad Money" program, he has a segment titled "Are you diversified?" People call in and give him five stocks they own in various industries.
He opines whether there is sufficient diversification in the portfolio.
All he is doing is suggesting how to hedge unsystematic risk.
Systematic or market risk will remain in the portfolios.
Index Funds The popular S&P 500 index funds are subject to market risk while diversifying away much of the specific risk of owning a specific stock or sector.
$10,000 invested into an S&P 500 index fund on January 4, 2000 would be worth $9,373.
09 as of November 30, 2009.
This is the affect systematic or market risk had on this investor's portfolio.
The diversification of holding the broad S&P 500 did not keep you from losing money.
Rather you felt the sting of owning the market, while employing appropriate hedge techniques would reduce or all but eliminate the affect of the losses in owning the market.
Core assets When examining a complete portfolio it is imperative to consider fully the important factors that comprise your core investable core assets.
Dr.
David Swensen, the Nobel Price winner in economics, has identified three characteristics of core assets that should be part of your evaluation to help reduce systematic or market risk.
oUse assets to hedge the market risk of other assets.
For example, real estate is a good hedge against the ravages of inflation, while bonds offer protection from a financial crisis.
By recognizing these inherent characteristics of your core assets, you can hedge some of the market risk inherent in an investing portfolio.
oThere should be fundamentally based market returns from the asset class.
If you are depending only on active management of the asset class, you are increasing the risk of losses by not being investing in the market.
oRely on liquid markets where there is a ready market to buy and sell your core asset.
Assets that cannot be immediately priced and sold, are subject to sudden and deep losses.
Liquid markets give you the opportunity to employ stop loss techniques should the market turn against you as in a recession.
Your stock portfolio is part of your total asset valuation that includes savings for emergencies, real estate, bonds, and possibly precious metals.
By taking this broad perspective, you have a better chance to employ overall hedges that are non-correlated to address market risk.
Asset Correlation In Modern Portfolio Theory, the most efficient method is to create an optimal mix of asset classes that generate the highest return to risk ratio.
By owning assets that do not correlation with each other, you can reduce the risk in your portfolio.
In a general sense, stocks and bonds tend to have a negative correlation.
When stocks perform well, bonds do not and when bonds perform well, stocks do not.
Market sectors have various levels of correlation.
Owning sectors that are not correlated highly help to reduce your risk.
For example, stocks are closely correlated to their sector.
In this case is better for the investor to own the sector rather than the individual.
Owning the sector helps to achieve some diversification, reducing specific risk of stock ownership.
By owning asset classes that are not highly correlated, you can reduce your risk.
The primary asset classes to consider are: oCommon assets of bonds, equities, real estate and cash oGeographies including the United States, European Union, the United Kingdom, Japan, China, India, Brazil and Latin America, rest of Asia, the Middle East.
oBond types such as Treasuries, corporate, short-term or long-term oMajor currencies including the US Dollar, the British Pound, the Euro, the Japanese Yen oIndustry sectors.
When you blend asset classes that have a low correlation to each other, you are lowering the risk in your portfolio.
Many investors fail to incorporate this thinking when they build their portfolios.
Using the R-Squared factor, a correlation of 1 indicates the asset classes are perfectly correlated.
A correlation coefficient of zero indicates there is no correlation in the performance of the asset classes.
For example, the S&P 500 and the Russell 2000 have a near perfect correlation of 0.
97.
Where as the average correlation among S&P sectors is 0.
32.
Asset allocation is the most essential factor in building a high performing portfolio.
Paying attention to the risk of each asset class allows you to create a portfolio that can beat the market in good times as well as bad.
SHARE
